4.5 Article

Structural and Biochemical Basis of Etoposide-Resistant Mutations in Topoisomerase IIα

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym14071309

关键词

topoisomerase II; etoposide; anticancer; DNA; supercoiling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the mechanism of etoposide resistance caused by specific mutations in TOP2A is investigated using biochemical and structural data. The findings suggest that mutations can impact the symmetrical relationships in the active site and surrounding regions, which in turn affect the coordination of DNA cleavage. The results highlight the importance of both local and long-distance factors in etoposide action, indicating interdependent relationships between structure and function.
Etoposide is a widely used anticancer drug that targets type II topoisomerases, including topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A). TOP2A is a nuclear enzyme involved in regulating DNA topology through a double-strand passage mechanism. TOP2A is a homodimeric enzyme with two symmetrical active sites formed by residues from either half of the dimer. Both active sites cleave DNA, forming an enzyme-bound, double-stranded DNA break. Etoposide acts by binding in the active site between the ends of cleaved DNA, preventing the enzyme from ligating the DNA. In the present study, biochemical and structural data are used to examine the mechanism of etoposide resistance found with specific point mutations in TOP2A. Mutations near the active site (D463A, G534R, R487K), along with some outside of the active site (Delta A429 and P716L), are examined. We hypothesize that changes in the coordination of DNA cleavage results from mutations that impact symmetrical relationships in the active site and surrounding regions. In some cases, we report the first data on purified versions of these enzymes. Based upon our results, both local and long-distance factors can impact etoposide action and may indicate interdependent relationships in structure and function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据