4.6 Article

Multiple Intelligence Informed Resources for Addressing Sustainable Development Goals in Management Engineering

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14148439

关键词

multiple intelligences; competence; teaching-learning resources; engineering; inclusive education; sustainable development goal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The competence-based model emphasizes acquiring skills and abilities, but each student's individual circumstances affect the way they learn. Therefore, designing learning activities that consider the diversity of intelligences, abilities, and mindsets is crucial for promoting inclusive education and sustainable development.
The competence-based model focuses on acquiring skills and abilities, yet each student's individual circumstances condition the way in which they learn, develop, and implement them. Accordingly, there is a growing interest in defining learning activities that consider the diverse range of intelligences, abilities, and prevailing mindsets in each individual in order to promote inclusive education and sustainable development. This article seeks to design a methodology for the teaching-learning resources associated with the nature of the prevailing intelligence in the competence-based model. Thus, the competence-intelligence-resource triangle was proposed for promoting inclusive education in the degree in Management Engineering at the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU). A total of 99 teaching-learning resources, 11 competences, and 9 types of intelligence were combined. As far as the multiple intelligence approach is concerned, the 50 students surveyed prioritized logical-mathematical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, linguistic, and spatial intelligences. As a conclusion, the use of teaching-learning resources designed for promoting different types of intelligence in the competence-based model constitutes an adaptive strategy for the students to successfully acquire competences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据