4.5 Article

Physical and Chemical Properties and Subcutaneous Implantation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Mixed with Propylene Glycol

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 474-479

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.014

关键词

Biocompatibility; mineral trioxide aggregate; physical properties; propylene glycol

资金

  1. State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2013/04054-8, 2014/01003-6]
  2. CNPq [310915/2012-0]
  3. University of Malta Research Grant committee and the Faculty of Dental Surgery
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [13/04054-8] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical, chemical, and biological properties of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) mixed with 80% distilled water and 20% propylene glycol (PG) compared with MTA mixed with distilled water only. Methods: Flowability, film thickness, and solubility were analyzed according to American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association specification 57/2000. Initial and final setting times were assessed according to American Society for Testing and Materials specification C266/08. Porosity was assessed by using mercury intrusion porosimetry after 1 and 28 days of hydration, and the pH and calcium ion release were assessed after 3, 24, 72, and 168 hours. For the tissue reaction, the cements were implanted in 24 albino rats (2 groups, n = 12). An analysis of the inflammatory infiltrate was performed after 15, 30, and 60 days. Results: MTA + PG exhibited lower film thickness and higher final setting time. No differences were verified for flowability (P > .05). MTA PG showed high porosity at 1 day of hydration (P < .05). All the test cements demonstrated an alkaline pH. Microscopic analysis of the specimens revealed neoformation of connective tissue in contact with the cements. Conclusions: The introduction of PG as a mixing vehicle alters the physical and chemical properties of MTA and is biologically acceptable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据