4.6 Article

Research on the Removal of Sodium from Vanadium Tailings by Calcification Roasting and NaOH Leaching

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14159051

关键词

vanadium tailings; sodium removal; calcification roasting; volatilization; leaching

资金

  1. Chengde Jianlong Special Steel Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method for removing sodium from vanadium tailings by calcification roasting and subsequent NaOH leaching was proposed, which demonstrated that calcification roasting can not only volatilize a part of sodium but also facilitate the dissolution of sodium during the subsequent NaOH leaching process. The total removal efficiency of sodium was 80.37% under optimal conditions, and the residue obtained after sodium removal can be used for in-plant recycling in the blast furnace process.
Vanadium tailings are a common solid waste in the vanadium industry. As they are rich in Fe, vanadium tailings could be a potential raw material for the blast furnace. However, the presence of approximately 4% Na2O in vanadium tailings is a major impediment to its return to the blast furnace. A novel method for removing sodium from vanadium tailings by calcification roasting and subsequent NaOH leaching was proposed in this work. The method demonstrated that calcification roasting of vanadium tailings can not only volatilize a part of sodium but also facilitate the dissolution of sodium during the subsequent NaOH leaching process. The thermodynamic analysis and behaviors of vanadium tailings during calcification roasting were systematically investigated. The transformation of sodium-containing phases in vanadium tailings during calcification roasting was studied. Further, the promoting effect of calcification roasting on sodium leaching by NaOH was clarified. The total removal efficiency of sodium was 80.37% under optimal conditions, and the residue obtained after sodium removal can be used as a raw material in the blast furnace process for in-plant recycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据