4.6 Article

Economic Policy Uncertainty, Social Financing Scale and Local Fiscal Sustainability: Evidence from Local Governments in China

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14127343

关键词

economic policy uncertainty; social financing scale; fiscal sustainability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71971169]
  2. Shaanxi Provincial Philosophy and Social Sciences Leading Talents Program [2020063005SX]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the impact of economic policy uncertainty on fiscal sustainability and finds that it has a negative effect. The study also highlights that economic policy uncertainty primarily affects fiscal sustainability through the social financing scale.
The motivation for this paper is to investigate a previously unexplored exogenous shock to fiscal sustainability from economic policy uncertainty. To control for the impact of local government institutional and cultural factors on fiscal sustainability, we select data from 30 Chinese provinces for the 2012-2020 period for empirical analysis. We find that economic policy uncertainty shocks have a robust negative effect on fiscal sustainability after controlling for endogeneity. Economic policy uncertainty has an impact on fiscal sustainability mainly through the mediating variable of the social financing scale. To cope with the impact of uncertain economic policies, corporations reduce the scale of investment and financing, and residents have defensive savings motivations, reducing consumption and increasing savings. Therefore, economic policy uncertainty can lead to a reduction in the social financing scale. A reduction in the social financing scale can reduce government revenue and increase the debt scale. Ultimately, this leads to a decrease in the fiscal sustainability of local governments. This paper can provide a theoretical reference for reducing the negative impact of government policy adjustments and improving fiscal sustainability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据