4.6 Article

Dual-Wavelength Photoacoustic Computed Tomography with Piezoelectric Ring-Array Transducer for Imaging of Indocyanine Green Liposomes Aggregation in Tumors

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi13060946

关键词

photoacoustic computed tomography; piezoelectric transducer; indocyanine green; liposome; guidance

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology of Hunan Province
  2. High-tech Industry Science and Technology Innovation Leading Program [2020SK2003]
  3. Management Science and Technology Project of Hunan Province [2020YJ004]
  4. Central South University, Innovation Driven Program Team Project [2020CX004]
  5. Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hunan Province [2021JJ10069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized ICG-Lips and a dual-wavelength photoacoustic computed tomography (PACT) system to visualize the aggregation of ICG-Lips in tumors in real time, providing guidance for phototherapy. The work highlights the potential of PACT in real-time monitoring of in vivo drug distribution.
Recently, indocyanine green (ICG), as an FDA-approved dye, has been widely used for phototherapy. It is essential to obtain information on the migration and aggregation of ICG in deep tissues. However, existing fluorescence imaging platforms are not able to obtain the structural information of the tissues. Here, we prepared ICG liposomes (ICG-Lips) and built a dual-wavelength photoacoustic computed tomography (PACT) system with piezoelectric ring-array transducer to image the aggregation of ICG-Lips in tumors to guide phototherapy. Visible 780 nm light excited the photoacoustic (PA) effects of the ICG-Lips and near-infrared 1064 nm light provided the imaging of the surrounding tissues. The aggregation of ICG-Lips within the tumor and the surrounding tissues was visualized by PACT in real time. This work indicates that PACT with piezoelectric ring-array transducer has great potential in the real-time monitoring of in vivo drug distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据