4.8 Article

Frequency comb-to-comb stabilization over a 1.3-km free-space atmospheric optical link

期刊

LIGHT-SCIENCE & APPLICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41377-022-00940-3

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of the Republic of Korea [NRF-2012R1A3A1050386, NRF-2019K1A3A1A20092429, NRF2020R1A2C2102338, NRF-2021R1A4A1031660]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019K1A3A1A20092429] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, frequency comb-to-comb stabilization is achieved through coherent transfer of two separate comb lines via a freespace optical link, with strict control of atmospheric phase noise. This method has potential value in applications such as broadband molecular spectroscopy and ultra-stable microwave generation.
Stabilizing a frequency comb to an ultra-stable optical frequency reference requires a multitude of optoelectronic peripherals that have to operate under strict ambient control. Meanwhile, the frequency comb-to-comb stabilization aims to synchronize a slave comb to a well-established master comb with a substantial saving in required equipment and efforts. Here, we report an utmost case of frequency comb-to-comb stabilization made through a 1.3 km freespace optical (FSO) link by coherent transfer of two separate comb lines along with a feedback suppression control of atmospheric phase noise. The FSO link offers a transfer stability of 1.7 x 10(-)(15) at 0.1 s averaging, while transporting the master comb's stability of 1.2 x 10(-)(15) at 1.0 s over the entire spectrum of the slave comb. Our remote comb-to-comb stabilization is intended to expedite diverse long-distance ground-to-ground or ground-to-satellite applications; as demonstrated here for broadband molecular spectroscopy over a 6 THz bandwidth as well as ultra-stable microwaves generation with phase noise of -80 dBc Hz(-1) at 1 Hz.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据