4.4 Article

Multispecies Probiotic for the Prevention of Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea in Children A Randomized Clinical Trial

期刊

JAMA PEDIATRICS
卷 176, 期 9, 页码 860-866

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1973

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical University of Warsaw and Amsterdam UMC receivedadonation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficacy of multispecies probiotic formulations in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in children is unclear. This study found that while the multispecies probiotic did not reduce the risk of AAD according to a strict definition, it did decrease the overall risk of diarrhea during and after antibiotic treatment.
IMPORTANCE The efficacy of multispecies probiotic formulations in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (MD) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of a multispecies probiotic on the risk of AAD in children. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized, quadruple-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted from February 2018 to May 2021 in a multicenter, mixed setting (inpatients and outpatients). Patients were followed up throughout the intervention period. Eligibility criteria included age 3 months to 18 years, recruitment within 24 hours following initiation of broad-spectrum systemic antibiotics, and signed informed consent. In total, 646 eligible patients were approached and 350 patients took part in the trial. INTERVENTIONS A multispecies probiotic consisting of Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, L acidophilus W55, Lactocaseibacillus paracasei W20, Lactoplantibacillus plantatum W62, Lactocaseibacillus rhamnosus W71, and Ligilactobacillus salivarius W24, for a total dose of 10 billion colony-forming units daily, for the duration of antibiotic treatment and for 7 days after. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was AAD, defined as 3 or more loose or watery stools per day in a 24-hour period, caused either by Clostridioides difficile or of otherwise unexplained etiology, after testing for common diarrheal pathogens. The secondary outcomes included diarrhea regardless of the etiology, diarrhea duration, and predefined diarrhea complications. RESULTS A total of 350 children (192 boys and 158 girls; mean [range] age, 50 [3-212] months) were randomized and 313 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Compared with placebo (n = 155), the probiotic (n = 158) had no effect on risk of AAD (relative risk [RR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.49-1.33). However, children in the probiotic group had a lower risk of diarrhea regardless of the etiology (RR, 0.65; 95% Cl, OA-4-0.94). No differences were observed between the groups for most of the secondary outcomes, including adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE A multispecies probiotic did not reduce the risk of AAD in children when analyzed according to the most stringent definition. However, it reduced the overall risk of diarrhea during and for 7 days after antibiotic treatment. Our study also shows that the MD definition has a significant effect on clinical trial results and their interpretation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据