4.4 Article

Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2022)036

关键词

Anomalies in Field and String Theories; Confinement; Duality in Gauge Field Theories; Topological States of Matter

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [22H01218, 20K22350]
  2. JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists Grant [20J20215]
  3. Center for Gravitational Physics and Quantum Information (CGPQI) at Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article studies the properties of self-duality symmetry in the Cardy-Rabinovici model. The self-duality is realized as a non-invertible symmetry due to complications in its realization, and at certain points, a mixed gravitational anomaly is detected. The article also explores how the phase diagram of the Cardy-Rabinovici model satisfies the anomaly matching condition.
We study properties of self-duality symmetry in the Cardy-Rabinovici model. The Cardy-Rabinovici model is the 4d U(1) gauge theory with electric and magnetic matters, and it enjoys the SL(2,Z) self-duality at low-energies. SL(2,Z) self-duality does not realize in a naive way, but we notice that the STp duality transformation becomes the legitimate duality operation by performing the gauging of Z(N) 1-form symmetry with including the level-p discrete topological term. Due to such complications in its realization, the fusion rule of duality defects becomes a non-group-like structure, and thus the self-duality symmetry is realized as a non-invertible symmetry. Moreover, for some fixed points of the self-duality, the duality symmetry turns out to have a mixed gravitational anomaly detected on a K3 surface, and we can rule out the trivially gapped phase as a consequence of anomaly matching. We also uncover how the conjectured phase diagram of the Cardy-Rabinovici model satisfies this new anomaly matching condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据