4.4 Article

Scale setting for large-N SUSY Yang-Mills on the lattice

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2022)074

关键词

1/N Expansion; Lattice Quantum Field Theory; Other Lattice Field Theories; Supersymmetric Gauge Theory

资金

  1. MCIN/AEI [PGC2018-094857-B-I00]
  2. ERDF A way of making Europe
  3. Spanish Research Agency (Agencia Estatal de Investigacion) through grants IFT Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa) - MCIN/AEI [SEV-2016-0597, CEX2020-001007-S]
  4. EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, STRONG-2020 project [824093]
  5. JSPS KAKENHI [21K03576]
  6. MEXT [JPMXP1020200105]
  7. JICFuS
  8. HPCI System Research Project [hp220011, hp210027, hp200027, hp190004]
  9. [H2020-MSCAITN-2018813942]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the large N limit of four-dimensional Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory is studied using twisted reduced models. Configurations with dynamical massive gluinos and various lattice 't Hooft couplings are generated, and it is confirmed that the Pfaffian remains positive. The lattice spacing is determined in terms of various observables, obtaining compatible results. Extrapolation to the massless gluino limit reveals the lattice spacing dependence on the bare couplings for the supersymmetric theory, which agrees with the expected behavior predicted by perturbation theory.
In this paper we study the large N limit of four-dimensional Supersymmetric Yang-Mills on the lattice using twisted reduced models. We have generated configurations with dynamical massive gluinos and various lattice 't Hooft couplings, and verified that the Pfaffian remains positive. We have determined the lattice spacing in terms of various observables obtaining compatible results. Extrapolating to the massless gluino limit we obtain the lattice spacing dependence on the bare couplings for the supersymmetric theory. The observed dependence goes along the expected behaviour predicted by perturbation theory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据