4.4 Article

Doubly peaked induced stochastic gravitational wave background: testing baryogenesis from primordial black holes

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2022)130

关键词

Baryo-and Leptogenesis; Early Universe Particle Physics

资金

  1. Indian Institute of Science(IISc), Bangalore, India
  2. Polish National Science Center [2018/31/D/ST2/02048]
  3. Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange within Polish Returns Programme [PPN/PPO/2020/1/00013/U/00001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research suggests that the Hawking evaporation of primordial black holes (PBHs) can contribute to the generation of matter-antimatter asymmetry. A novel test of this scenario is proposed, which involves detecting the characteristic doubly peaked gravitational wave (GW) spectrum in future GW observatories. The unique GW spectral shape observed could provide evidence of non-thermal baryogenesis from evaporating PBHs.
Hawking evaporation of primordial black holes (PBHs) can facilitate the generation of matter-antimatter asymmetry. We focus on ultra-low mass PBHs that briefly dominate the universe and evaporate before the big bang nucleosynthesis. We propose a novel test of this scenario by detecting its characteristic doubly peaked gravitational wave (GW) spectrum in future GW observatories. Here the first order adiabatic perturbation from inflation and from the isocurvature perturbations due to PBH distribution, source tensor perturbations in second-order and lead to two peaks in the induced GW background. These resonant peaks are generated at the beginning of standard radiation domination in the presence of a prior PBH-dominated era. This unique GW spectral shape would provide a smoking gun signal of non-thermal baryogenesis from evaporating PBHs, which is otherwise impossible to test in laboratory experiments due to the very high energy scales involved or the feeble interaction of the dark sector with the visible sector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据