4.4 Article

T(T)over-bar deformations of supersymmetric quantum mechanics

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2022)121

关键词

Field Theories in Lower Dimensions; Superspaces; Extended Supersymmetry

资金

  1. Bhaumik Institute
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0009999]
  3. University of California
  4. Simons Collaborations on Ultra-Quantum Matter from the Simons Foundation [651440]
  5. US Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0009919]
  6. Simons Foundation [568420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work introduces a manifestly supersymmetric version of the T(bar)T deformation suitable for (0 + 1)-dimensional theories with N = 1 or N = 2 supersymmetry and presents the corresponding f(Q) deformations. Evidence is provided showing the on-shell equivalence between the f(Q) deformations of N = 1 and N = 2 theories and the dimensionally reduced supercurrent-squared deformations of 2d theories with different levels of supersymmetry. Additionally, two forms of the f(Q) deformation in the N = 1 case are discussed and their equivalence is clarified through analogous deformations in the non-supersymmetric setting.
We define a manifestly supersymmetric version of the T (T) over bar deformation appropriate for a class of (0 + 1)-dimensional theories with N = 1 or N = 2 supersymmetry, including one presentation of the super-Schwarzian theory which is dual to JT supergravity. These deformations are written in terms of Noether currents associated with translations in superspace, so we refer to them collectively as f(Q) deformations. We provide evidence that the f(Q) deformations of N = 1 and N = 2 theories are on-shell equivalent to the dimensionally reduced supercurrent-squared deformations of 2d theories with N = (0, 1) and N = (1, 1) supersymmetry, respectively. In the N = 1 case, we present two forms of the f(Q) deformation which drive the same flow, and clarify their equivalence by studying the analogous equivalent deformations in the non-supersymmetric setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据