4.5 Article

Some insight into bronze quadrigati: a multi-analytical approach

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-022-01589-0

关键词

Ancient coins; Debased quadrigati; Silver surface enrichment; Neutron diffraction; X-ray fluorescence; Scanning electron microscope

资金

  1. Universita degli Studi di Torino within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the study of debased quadrigati, a lesser-known area of Roman Republican early coinage. Through rigorous analytical investigations and numismatic classification, the paper establishes a clear correlation between series and debasement, shedding light on unknown financial and political facts pertaining to the Second Punic War.
One of the more obscure areas of Roman Republican early coinage are debased quadrigati, which traditionally are deemed to represent the last stage of this coin type. Starting from a pre-screening, based on low specific gravity samples, we first performed neutron diffraction analyses on a larger sample, which allowed us to single out the more debased series. Subsequently, we focused on those series and applied various additional physical investigations on 18 specimens. The focus of this paper is 17 samples displaying very low silver content. They all belong to a very particular group, refereed as Apulian quadrigati in previous literature. They are selected for their numismatic differences and to put in evidence the relevant details of their silver quality, which ranges from apparently good to plain bronze. In this work, we combine rigorous analytical investigations like X-ray fluorescence (both ordinary and micro-), scanning electron microscope, and neutron diffraction to our accurate numismatic classification of the specimens, leading to a clear correlation between series and debasement. This work aims in particular to gain better insights into these mysterious silver emissions, bringing new results that can disclose unknown financial and political facts pertaining to the Second Punic War.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据