4.6 Article

Measurements and Modeling of Atomic-Scale Sidewall Roughness and Losses in Integrated Photonic Devices

期刊

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.202102073

关键词

atomic force microscopy; integrated photonics; sidewall roughness; silicon nitride; waveguides

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OMA-1936345, NNCI-2025233]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [HR0011-19-2-0014]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-15-1-0303, FA8650-19-C-1002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method using atomic force microscopy to measure waveguide sidewall roughness and a new bending model for predicting device performance are developed in this study, which are of great importance for optimizing fabrication of state-of-the-art photonic devices.
Atomic-level imperfections play an increasingly critical role in nanophotonic device performance. However, it remains challenging to accurately characterize the sidewall roughness with sub-nanometer resolution and directly correlate this roughness with device performance. A method that allows to measure the sidewall roughness of waveguides made of any material (including dielectrics) using the high resolution of atomic force microscopy is developed. This method is illustrated by measuring state-of-the-art photonic devices made of silicon nitride. The roughness of devices fabricated using both deep ultraviolet (DUV) photo-lithography and electron-beam lithography for two different etch processes is compared. To correlate roughness with device performance, a new Payne-Lacey Bending model is described, which adds a correction factor to the widely used Payne-Lacey model so that losses in resonators and waveguides with bends can be accurately predicted given the sidewall roughness, waveguide width and bending radii. Having a better way to measure roughness and use it to predict device performance can allow researchers and engineers to optimize fabrication for state-of-the-art photonics using many materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据