4.7 Article

Sapovaccarin-S1 and-S2, Two Type I RIP Isoforms from the Seeds of Saponaria vaccaria L.

期刊

TOXINS
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins14070449

关键词

plant toxin; ribosome-inactivating protein (RIP); type I RIP; rRNA glycosylase activity (EC 3; 2; 2; 22); protein isolation; protein sequencing; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [422686308]
  2. Open Access Publication Fund of the Freie Universitat Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified two new isoforms of type I ribosome-inactivating proteins, sapovaccarin-S1 and -S2, which exhibited higher thermostability and anti-cancer activity. These findings suggest that sapovaccarin-S1 and -S2 are promising candidates for targeted anti-cancer therapy.
Type I ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) are plant toxins that inhibit protein synthesis by exerting rRNA N-glycosylase activity (EC 3.2.2.22). Due to the lack of a cell-binding domain, type I RIPs are not target cell-specific. However once linked to antibodies, so called immunotoxins, they are promising candidates for targeted anti-cancer therapy. In this study, sapovaccarin-S1 and -S2, two newly identified type I RIP isoforms differing in only one amino acid, were isolated from the seeds of Saponaria vaccaria L. Sapovaccarin-S1 and -S2 were purified using ammonium sulfate precipitation and subsequent cation exchange chromatography. The determined molecular masses of 28,763 Da and 28,793 Da are in the mass range typical for type I RIPs and the identified amino acid sequences are homologous to known type I RIPs such as dianthin 30 and saporin-S6 (79% sequence identity each). Sapovaccarin-S1 and -S2 showed adenine-releasing activity and induced cell death in Huh-7 cells. In comparison to other type I RIPs, sapovaccarin-S1 and -S2 exhibited a higher thermostability as shown by nano-differential scanning calorimetry. These results suggest that sapovaccarin-S1 and -S2 would be optimal candidates for targeted anti-cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据