4.7 Article

Modeling Spatiotemporal Patterns of Land Use/Land Cover Change in Central Malawi Using a Neural Network Model

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14143477

关键词

land cover; remote sensing; neural network; Malawi; Africa

资金

  1. American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
  2. USAID [AID-OAA-L-14-00006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines Land Use Land Cover Change (LULCC) in the Dedza and Ntcheu districts of Central Malawi and models the anthropogenic and environmental drivers. The findings suggest that agriculture will dominate the landscape in the future and future land management should focus on spatiotemporal patterns in land cover and develop multidimensional policies that promote land conservation in the local context.
We examine Land Use Land Cover Change (LULCC) in the Dedza and Ntcheu districts of Central Malawi and model anthropogenic and environmental drivers. We present an integrative approach to understanding heterogenous landscape interactions and short- to long-term shocks and how they inform future land management and policy in Malawi. Landsat 30-m satellite imagery for 2001, 2009, and 2019 was used to identify and quantify LULCC outcomes based on eight input classes: agriculture, built-up areas, barren, water, wetlands, forest-mixed vegetation, shrub-woodland, and other. A Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network was developed to examine land-cover transitions based on the drivers; elevation, slope, soil texture, population density and distance from roads and rivers. Agriculture is projected to dominate the landscape by 2050. Dedza has a higher probability of future land conversion to agriculture (0.45 to 0.70) than Ntcheu (0.30 to 0.45). These findings suggest that future land management initiatives should focus on spatiotemporal patterns in land cover and develop multidimensional policies that promote land conservation in the local context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据