4.7 Review

The Impact of Polymer Electrolyte Properties on Lithium-Ion Batteries

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14153101

关键词

electrolyte; ionic liquid; polymer; hybrid; composite; lithium-ion conductivity; lithium-ion

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL from the Institute of Materials Science, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt Federal Republic of Germany
  2. Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia [0005-1442-S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discusses the impact of different polymer electrolytes on the performance of lithium-ion batteries, emphasizing the need for an excellent electrolyte to possess multiple properties (such as Li+ diffusion, resistance, capacity, etc.) and pointing out that a single electrolyte may not be sufficient to meet requirements.
In recent decades, the enhancement of the properties of electrolytes and electrodes resulted in the development of efficient electrochemical energy storage devices. We herein reported the impact of the different polymer electrolytes in terms of physicochemical, thermal, electrical, and mechanical properties of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Since LIBs use many groups of electrolytes, such as liquid electrolytes, quasi-solid electrolytes, and solid electrolytes, the efficiency of the full device relies on the type of electrolyte used. A good electrolyte is the one that, when used in Li-ion batteries, exhibits high Li+ diffusion between electrodes, the lowest resistance during cycling at the interfaces, a high capacity of retention, a very good cycle-life, high thermal stability, high specific capacitance, and high energy density. The impact of various polymer electrolytes and their components has been reported in this work, which helps to understand their effect on battery performance. Although, single-electrolyte material cannot be sufficient to fulfill the requirements of a good LIB. This review is aimed to lead toward an appropriate choice of polymer electrolyte for LIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据