4.7 Article

A bivalent CMV vaccine formulated with human compatible TLR9 agonist CpG1018 elicits potent cellular and humoral immunity in HLA expressing mice

期刊

PLOS PATHOGENS
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010403

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) [1132519]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have designed a novel bivalent subunit vaccine against CMV, which combines CMV-encoded oligomeric glycoprotein B, polyepitope protein, and a TLR9 agonist to induce both humoral and cellular immune responses. The vaccine generated durable anti-viral antibodies and CMV-specific T cell responses in mice, and showed the potential to prevent CMV-associated complications.
There is now convincing evidence that the successful development of an effective CMV vaccine will require improved formulation and adjuvant selection that is capable of inducing both humoral and cellular immune responses. Here, we have designed a novel bivalent subunit vaccine formulation based on CMV-encoded oligomeric glycoprotein B (gB) and polyepitope protein in combination with human compatible TLR9 agonist CpG1018. The polyepitope protein includes multiple minimal HLA class I-restricted CD8(+) T cell epitopes from different antigens of CMV. This subunit vaccine generated durable anti-viral antibodies, CMV-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses in multiple HLA expressing mice. Antibody responses included broad T(H)1 isotypes (IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG3) and potently neutralized CMV infection in fibroblasts and epithelial cells. Furthermore, polyfunctional antigen-specific T cell immunity and antiviral antibody responses showed long-term memory maintenance. These observations argue that this novel vaccine strategy, if applied to humans, could facilitate the generation of robust humoral and cellular immune responses which may be more effective in preventing CMV-associated complications in various clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据