4.5 Article

Stress recovery of laminated non-prismatic beams under layerwise traction and body forces

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10999-022-09601-0

关键词

Non-prismatic beam; Tapered beam; Laminated beam; Layerwise load; Traction; Stress recovery

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [15/RP/2773]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emerging manufacturing technologies allow for the production of slender and complex-shaped structures. However, current analytical methods for stress analysis often oversimplify the real behavior of laminated tapered beams. To address these limitations, this study proposes a simple and efficient stress recovery method that considers layerwise body forces and traction loads, as well as the effects of stiffness and load distributions. The model is validated through comparison with finite element analysis and analytical formulations.
Emerging manufacturing technologies, including 3D printing and additive layer manufacturing, offer scope for making slender heterogeneous structures with complex geometry. Modern applications include tapered sandwich beams employed in the aeronautical industry, wind turbine blades and concrete beams used in construction. It is noteworthy that state-of-the-art closed form solutions for stresses are often excessively simple to be representative of real laminated tapered beams. For example, centroidal variation with respect to the neutral axis is neglected, and the transverse direct stress component is disregarded. Also, non-classical terms arise due to interactions between stiffness and external load distributions. Another drawback is that the external load is assumed to react uniformly through the cross-section in classical beam formulations, which is an inaccurate assumption for slender structures loaded on only a sub-section of the entire cross-section. To address these limitations, a simple and efficient yet accurate analytical stress recovery method is presented for laminated non-prismatic beams with arbitrary cross-sectional shapes under layerwise body forces and traction loads. Moreover, closed-form solutions are deduced for rectangular cross-sections. The proposed method invokes Cauchy stress equilibrium followed by implementing appropriate interfacial boundary conditions. The main novelties comprise the 2D transverse stress field recovery considering centroidal variation with respect to the neutral axis, application of layerwise external loads, and consideration of effects where stiffness and external load distributions differ. A state of plane stress under small linear-elastic strains is assumed, for cases where beam thickness taper is restricted to 15 degrees. The model is validated by comparison with finite element analysis and relevant analytical formulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据