4.5 Article

Groundwater aquifer assessment using hydrogeophysical investigations: the case of western Al Ain Sokhna area, Gulf of Suez, Eastern Desert, Egypt

期刊

GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL
卷 37, 期 27, 页码 16512-16533

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2109762

关键词

Hydrochemical; resistivity; evaluation; groundwater; quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assesses the groundwater aquifer in the Gulf of Suez region and determines the water quality using hydrochemical and electrical resistivity techniques. The results show that there are five geoelectrical layers in the subsurface, with the third layer representing the freshwater aquifer and the fourth layer representing the brackish water aquifer.
This study aims to assess the groundwater aquifer and defined the quality of water in the Gulf of Suez region. Hydrochemical and electrical resistivity techniques have been used for evaluating an aquifer, including its extension and quality, in the western Al Ain Sokhna area, Gulf of Suez. This study collected 16 groundwater samples from wells tapping the upper Miocene aquifer. Laboratory tests, including the estimation of electrical conductivity (E.C.), pH, total dissolved solids (TDS) and major ions such as Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, CO32-, HCO33-, SO42- and Cl-, were conducted. Most water samples belonged to the category of permissible water (TDS 500-1500 ppm) which represented 62.5% and brackish water which represented 37.5%. A total of 47 vertical electrical sounding stations were measured using the Schlumberger array of AB/2 up to 1500 m to detect the subsurface geologic section and delineate water-bearing layers. The results of geoelectrical interpretation illustrated that the subsurface section has five geoelectrical layers. The third layer represents the freshwater aquifer, and the fourth layer represents the brackish water aquifer. The upper Miocene aquifer represents the first aquifer with fresh groundwater of resistivities ranging from 14.7 to 100 omega.m and thickness ranging between 28.4 and 86 m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据