4.7 Article

Adipose methylome integrative-omic analyses reveal genetic and dietary metabolic health drivers and insulin resistance classifiers

期刊

GENOME MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13073-022-01077-z

关键词

DNA methylation; Visceral fat; Adiposity; Integrative omics

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. European Community
  3. Medical Research Council
  4. Versus Arthritis
  5. European Union Horizon 2020
  6. Chronic Disease Research Foundation (CDRF)
  7. Zoe Ltd
  8. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  9. King's College London
  10. JPI ERA-HDHL DIMENSION project
  11. UK Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/S020845/1, BB/T019980/1]
  12. Swedish Research Council [Dnr 2016-02486, 2018-02567, Dnr 2009-1039]
  13. Region Skane
  14. ALF
  15. Novo Nordisk foundation
  16. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research [Dnr IRC150067]
  17. Diabetes Foundation
  18. Swedish Research Council [2018-02567] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the researchers dissected the methylation signature of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) relevant to metabolic health by focusing on visceral fat as the major risk factor. They identified 1181 CpG positions in 788 genes to be differentially methylated with visceral fat, with enrichment in the insulin signaling pathway. Cross-omic analysis highlighted genes with strong relevance to metabolic disease mechanisms.
Background There is considerable evidence for the importance of the DNA methylome in metabolic health, for example, a robust methylation signature has been associated with body mass index (BMI). However, visceral fat (VF) mass accumulation is a greater risk factor for metabolic disease than BMI alone. In this study, we dissect the subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) methylome signature relevant to metabolic health by focusing on VF as the major risk factor of metabolic disease. We integrate results with genetic, blood methylation, SAT gene expression, blood metabolomic, dietary intake and metabolic phenotype data to assess and quantify genetic and environmental drivers of the identified signals, as well as their potential functional roles. Methods Epigenome-wide association analyses were carried out to determine visceral fat mass-associated differentially methylated positions (VF-DMPs) in SAT samples from 538 TwinsUK participants. Validation and replication were performed in 333 individuals from 3 independent cohorts. To assess functional impacts of the VF-DMPs, the association between VF and gene expression was determined at the genes annotated to the VF-DMPs and an association analysis was carried out to determine whether methylation at the VF-DMPs is associated with gene expression. Further epigenetic analyses were carried out to compare methylation levels at the VF-DMPs as the response variables and a range of different metabolic health phenotypes including android:gynoid fat ratio (AGR), lipids, blood metabolomic profiles, insulin resistance, T2D and dietary intake variables. The results from all analyses were integrated to identify signals that exhibit altered SAT function and have strong relevance to metabolic health. Results We identified 1181 CpG positions in 788 genes to be differentially methylated with VF (VF-DMPs) with significant enrichment in the insulin signalling pathway. Follow-up cross-omic analysis of VF-DMPs integrating genetics, gene expression, metabolomics, diet, and metabolic traits highlighted VF-DMPs located in 9 genes with strong relevance to metabolic disease mechanisms, with replication of signals in FASN, SREBF1, TAGLN2, PC and CFAP410. PC methylation showed evidence for mediating effects of diet on VF. FASN DNA methylation exhibited putative causal effects on VF that were also strongly associated with insulin resistance and methylation levels in FASN better classified insulin resistance (AUC=0.91) than BMI or VF alone. Conclusions Our findings help characterise the adiposity-associated methylation signature of SAT, with insights for metabolic disease risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据