4.6 Article

Evaluating the impact of sulfamethoxazole on hydrogen production during dark anaerobic sludge fermentation

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11783-023-1607-2

关键词

Sulfamethoxazole; Hydrogen production; Dark anaerobic fermentation; Waste activated sludge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of antibiotics on hydrogen production during dark anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge (WAS). The results demonstrate that sulfamethoxazole (SMX) promotes hydrogen production by enhancing hydrolysis and acidification processes, while inhibiting methanogenesis.
The impact of antibiotics on the environmental protection and sludge treatment fields has been widely studied. The recovery of hydrogen from waste activated sludge (WAS) has become an issue of great interest. Nevertheless, few studies have focused on the impact of antibiotics present in WAS on hydrogen production during dark anaerobic fermentation. To explore the mechanisms, sulfamethoxazole (SMX) was chosen as a representative antibiotic to evaluate how SMX influenced hydrogen production during dark anaerobic fermentation of WAS. The results demonstrated SMX promoted hydrogen production. With increasing additions of SMX from 0 to 500 mg/kg TSS, the cumulative hydrogen production elevated from 8.07 +/- 0.37 to 11.89 +/- 0.19 mL/g VSS. A modified Gompertz model further verified that both the maximum potential of hydrogen production (P-m) and the maximum rate of hydrogen production (R-m) were promoted. SMX did not affected sludge solubilization, but promoted hydrolysis and acidification processes to produce more hydrogen. Moreover, the methanogenesis process was inhibited so that hydrogen consumption was reduced. Microbial community analysis further demonstrated that the introduction of SMX improved the abundance of hydrolysis bacteria and hydrogen-volatile fatty acids (VFAs) producers. SMX synergistically influenced hydrolysis, acidification and acetogenesis to facilitate the hydrogen production. (C) Higher Education Press 2023

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据