4.5 Article

Row crop fields provide mid-summer forage for honey bees

期刊

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8979

关键词

Apis mellifera; foraging ecology; peanut foraging; row crops; waggle dance

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [VA-160097]
  2. Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research [549044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Honey bees provide important services but face health issues. This study investigated the foraging behavior of honey bees in a row crop environment and found that row crop fields are a significant source of summer foraging opportunities for bees.
Honey bees provide invaluable economic and ecological services while simultaneously facing stressors that may compromise their health. For example, agricultural landscapes, such as a row crop system, are necessary for our food production, but they may cause poor nutrition in bees from a lack of available nectar and pollen. Here, we investigated the foraging dynamics of honey bees in a row crop environment. We decoded, mapped, and analyzed 3459 waggle dances, which communicate the location of where bees collected food, for two full foraging seasons (April-October, 2018-2019). We found that bees recruited nestmates mostly locally (<2 km) throughout the season. The shortest communicated median distances (0.474 and 0.310 km), indicating abundant food availability, occurred in July in both years, which was when our row crops were in full bloom. We determined, by plotting and analyzing the communicated locations, that almost half of the mid-summer recruitment was to row crops, with 37% (2018) and 50% (2019) of honey bee dances indicating these fields. Peanut was the most attractive in July, followed by corn and cotton but not soybean. Overall, row crop fields are indicated by a surprisingly large proportion of recruitment dances, suggesting that similar agricultural landscapes may also provide mid-summer foraging opportunities for honey bees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据