4.8 Article

Structural basis for acyl chain control over glycosphingolipid sorting and vesicular trafficking

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111063

关键词

-

资金

  1. Janelia Farms Advanced Imaging Center
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  3. HHMI at HHMI's Janelia Research Campus
  4. Harvard Center for Biological Imaging
  5. Boston Children's Hospital Cell Function and Imaging Core
  6. HDDC Imaging Core
  7. [R37 DK048106]
  8. [RO1 DK104868]
  9. [P30 DK034854]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates how the acyl chain structures of complex sphingolipids influence their secretion and intracellular distribution, and finds that lysosomal sorting is achieved by excluding the endocytic pathway sorting tubules. Additionally, cholesterol and unsaturation of the acyl chains also impact the sorting of sphingolipids.
The complex sphingolipids exhibit a diversity of ceramide acyl chain structures that influence their trafficking and intracellular distributions, but it remains unclear how the cell discerns among the different ceramides to affect such sorting. To address the mechanism, we synthesize a library of GM1 glycosphingolipids with naturally varied acyl chains and quantitatively assess their sorting among different endocytic pathways. We find that a stretch of at least 14 saturated carbons extending from C1 at the water-bilayer interface dictate lysosomal sorting by exclusion from endosome sorting tubules. Sorting to the lysosome by the C14* motif is cholesterol dependent. Perturbations of the C14* motif by unsaturation enable GM1 entry into endosomal sorting tubules of the recycling and retrograde pathways independent of cholesterol. Unsaturation occurring beyond the C14* motif in very long acyl chains rescues lysosomal sorting. These results define a structural motif underlying the membrane organization of sphingolipids and implicate cholesterol-sphingolipid nano-domain formation in sorting mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据