4.8 Article

EPH receptor tyrosine kinases phosphorylate the PAR-3 scaffold protein to modulate downstream signaling networks

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111031

关键词

-

资金

  1. FRQNT Team Grant [2019 -PR -254641]
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation [30308, 34963]
  3. Canada Research Chair (Tier 2) in Cancer Proteomics
  4. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante (FRQS)
  5. PROTEO scholarship
  6. FRQNT scholarship
  7. Pierre-J-Durand/Citoyen du Monde scholarship
  8. Louis-Poirier scholarship
  9. HOG scholarship
  10. NSERC
  11. FRQS Doctoral Award
  12. CIHR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study unravels the signaling networks of EPHRs in regulating cellular phenotypes by identifying protein complexes and their interactions. The results show that EPHRs directly phosphorylate PAR-3 and recruit CSK, which are crucial for cell sorting.
EPH receptors (EPHRs) constitute the largest family among receptor tyrosine kinases in humans. They are mainly involved in short-range cell-cell communication events that regulate cell adhesion, migration, and boundary formation. However, the molecular mechanisms by which EPHRs control these processes are less understood. To address this, we unravel EPHR-associated complexes under native conditions using mass-spectrometry-based BioID proximity labeling. We obtain a composite proximity network from EPHA4,-B2,-B3, and-B4 that comprises 395 proteins, most of which were not previously linked to EPHRs. We examine the contribution of several BioID-identified candidates via loss-of-function in an EPHR-dependent cell-segregation assay. We find that the signaling scaffold PAR-3 is required for cell sorting and that EPHRs directly phosphorylate PAR-3. We also delineate a signaling complex involving the C -termi-nal SRC kinase (CSK), whose recruitment to PAR-3 is dependent on EPHR signals. Our work describes signaling networks by which EPHRs regulate cellular phenotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据