4.6 Review

Broadening the diversity of consumers engaged in guidelines: a scoping review

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058326

关键词

statistics & research methods; protocols & guidelines; epidemiology

资金

  1. Stroke Foundation - Australian Government via the Medical Research Future Fund
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), an Australian Government statutory agency
  3. [APP1132803]
  4. [APP1197324]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to identify principles and approaches to broaden the diversity of consumers engaged in guideline development. The findings emphasize the importance of relationship-building, mitigating power imbalances, and meeting consumers' needs. Engaging with diverse groups requires greater attention to building formal, respectful partnerships and employing inclusive engagement methods.
Background Guideline developers are encouraged to engage patients, carers and their representatives ('consumers') from diverse backgrounds in guideline development to produce more widely applicable guidelines. However, consumers from diverse backgrounds are infrequently included in guidelines and there is scant research to support guideline developers to do this. Objectives To identify principles and approaches to broaden the diversity of consumers engaged in guideline development. Design Scoping review and semi-structured interviews. Methods We conducted comprehensive searches to March 2020 for studies, reports and guidance documents. Inclusion criteria included the terms 'consumer' (patients, carers and their representatives), 'diversity' (defined using the PROGRESS-PLUS mnemonic) and 'consumer engagement' (the active involvement of consumers at any stage of guideline development). We also conducted four interviews with consumers and guideline developers. We used descriptive synthesis to identify themes, and summarised information about implemented approaches used to broaden diversity of consumers in guidelines. Results From 10 included documents, we identified eight themes. Themes covered general engagement concepts (Respectful partnerships; Recruitment; Expectations, process and review); specific concepts about guideline development group (GDG) engagement (Characteristics of guideline personnel; Consumers' role, characteristics and prominence; Preparing and supporting consumers); and other (non-GDG) approaches (Online methods; Consultations and research-based approaches). The most commonly included PROGRESS-PLUS categories were Disability, Race/culture/ethnicity/language, Place of residence and Other vulnerable (eg, 'disadvantaged groups'). Each theme included the views of both consumers and guideline developers. We found descriptions of 12 implemented engagement approaches to broaden diversity of consumers in guidelines. Conclusions Relationship-building, mitigating power imbalances and meeting consumers where they are at underpin our findings. Engaging with diverse groups may require greater attention to building formal, respectful partnerships and employing inclusive engagement methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据