4.7 Article

Efficient CRISPR/Cas12a-Based Genome-Editing Toolbox for Metabolic Engineering in Methanococcus maripaludis

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00137

关键词

Methanococcus maripaludis; methanogens; CRISPR; Cas12a; genome editing; metabolic engineering; synthetic biology

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  2. Academy of Finland [NNF19OC0054329, 326020]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [326020, 326020] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A genome-editing toolbox using Cas12a from Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006 (LbCas12a) in combination with the endogenous homology-directed repair machinery of M. maripaludis has been designed, allowing reliable and quick genome editing in a methanogen.
The rapid-growing and genetically tractable methanogen Methanococcus maripaludis is a promising host organism for the biotechnological conversion of carbon dioxide and renewable hydrogen to fuels and value-added products. Expansion of its product scope through metabolic engineering necessitates reliable and efficient genetic tools, particularly for genome edits that affect the primary metabolism and cell growth. Here, we have designed a genome-editing toolbox by utilizing Cas12a from Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006 (LbCas12a) in combination with the homology-directed repair machinery endogenously present in M. maripaludis. This toolbox can delete target genes with a success rate of up to 95%, despite the hyperpolyploidy of M. maripaludis. For the purpose of demonstrating a large deletion, the M. maripaludis flagellum operon (similar to 8.9 kbp) was replaced by the Escherichia coli beta-glucuronidase gene. To facilitate metabolic engineering and flux balancing in M. maripaludis, the relative strength of 15 different promoters was quantified in the presence of two common growth substrates, either formate or carbon dioxide and hydrogen. This CRISPR/LbCas12a toolbox can be regarded as a reliable and quick method for genome editing in a methanogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据