4.5 Review

Radiosurgery for Benign Vertebral Body Hemangiomas of the Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 97-105

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.120

关键词

Hemangioma; Radiosurgery; Radiotherapy; Spine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment for spinal vertebral hemangiomas. It provides significant pain relief for patients and does not result in progressive disease. However, higher radiation doses may cause damage to surrounding tissues.
OBJECTIVE: Spinal vertebral hemangiomas (SVHs) are the most common benign tumors of the spine. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of radiosurgery (RS) for SVHs. METHODS: We reviewed articles published between January 1990 and December 2020 on PubMed. Tumor control, pain relief, and damage to surrounding tissues were evaluated with separate meta-analyses. This study was performed in accordance with the published Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 23 patients with 24 SVHs were reported in 3 studies. RESULTS: Follow-up time was 7.3-84 months. The vast majority of lesions were located at dorsal level (n = 18; 75%). In 20 (83.3%) patients, pain was the initial clinical presentation. Complete, partial, and stable responses after radiation were reported in 45.7% (P < 0.001), 23.6% (P = 0.02), and 37.2% (P = 0.7) of cases. Overall response was reported in 94.1% (P = 0.7). No progressive disease was reported. Pain relief was achieved in 87.5% of patients (P = 0.2). Damage to surrounding tissue caused by irradiation was reported in 22.3% (P = 0.02) of cases in 1 study, in which higher doses of radiation were delivered. CONCLUSIONS: Radiosurgery is safe and effective for SVHs. Pain relief after RS in symptomatic patients was extremely high, while no progressive disease was reported. Damage to surrounding tissues was reported in only 1 series and included osteitis, osteonecrosis, or soft tissue injury after higher radiation doses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据