4.2 Article

Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods

期刊

STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 421-432

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2022.2081599

关键词

Causal inference; E9 addendum; Hypothetical estimand; Intercurrent events; Missing data

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article focuses on the hypothetical strategy proposed in ICH E9 addendum for handling intercurrent events. It discusses the estimation of treatment effect under the hypothetical scenario where intercurrent events are prevented using causal inference and missing data methods. The article establishes links between certain causal inference estimators and missing data estimators, which can be helpful for researchers familiar with one set of methods but not the other.
The ICH E9 addendum introduces the term intercurrent event to refer to events that happen after treatment initiation and that can either preclude observation of the outcome of interest or affect its interpretation. It proposes five strategies for handling intercurrent events to form an estimand but does not suggest statistical methods for estimation. In this article we focus on the hypothetical strategy, where the treatment effect is defined under the hypothetical scenario in which the intercurrent event is prevented. For its estimation, we consider causal inference and missing data methods. We establish that certain causal inference estimators are identical to certain missing data estimators. These links may help those familiar with one set of methods but not the other. Moreover, using potential outcome notation allows us to state more clearly the assumptions on which missing data methods rely to estimate hypothetical estimands. This helps to indicate whether estimating a hypothetical estimand is reasonable, and what data should be used in the analysis. We show that hypothetical estimands can be estimated by exploiting data after intercurrent event occurrence, which is typically not used. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据