4.4 Article

Use of physical testing data for the accurate prediction of the ultimate compressive strength of steel stiffened panels

期刊

SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 609-623

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17445302.2022.2087358

关键词

Ultimate compressive strength; steel stiffened plate structures; physical testing data; empirical formula; Paik-Thayamballi formula

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the use of physical testing data to predict the ultimate compressive strength of steel stiffened panels, and introduces existing empirical formulae. Through research on advanced testing data of modern materials and fabrication technologies, the compatibility between these data and established formulae is determined.
Physical testing data can be used to predict the ultimate compressive strength of steel stiffened panels. Moreover, useful empirical formulae have been developed by fitting curves to data from relevant testing databases. A representative example is the Paik-Thayamballi formula, which is based on physical testing data available until 1997 and is a closed-form function of plate and column slenderness ratios. Since 1997, high-precision data-acquisition equipment and large-scale physical models have been used to generate databases contained advanced testing data of modern materials such as AH32 high-tensile steel made by the thermo-mechanical control process (TMCP) technology together with modern fabrication technologies, e.g., flux-cored arc welding technique, under a strict control of welding parameters, e.g., current, voltage, speed and heat input, to achieve a required weld leg length. It is therefore important to determine if these advanced testing data are compatible with the established empirical formulae. This paper describes benchmark studies which were conducted to determine such compatibility, with a focus on the Paik-Thayamballi formula, and summarises key findings and insights obtained from the present study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据