4.7 Article

Contracted thalamic shape is associated with early development of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16747-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korean Healthy Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HU21C0053]
  2. Yonsei University College of Medicine [2022-32-0057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the occurrence of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease patients is associated with a contracted shape of the thalamus, independent of presynaptic dopamine depletion.
Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID), a long-term motor complication in Parkinson's disease (PD), is attributable to both presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms. However, no studies have evaluated the baseline structural changes associated with LID at a subcortical level in PD. A total of 116 right-handed PD patients were recruited and based on the LID latency of 5 years, we classified patients into those vulnerable to LID (PD-vLID, n = 49) and those resistant to LID (PD-rLID, n = 67). After adjusting for covariates including dopamine transporter (DAT) availability of the posterior putamen, we compared the subcortical shape between the groups and investigated its association with the onset of LID. The PD-vLID group had lower DAT availability in the posterior putamen, higher parkinsonian motor deficits, and faster increment in levodopa equivalent dose than the PD-rLID group. The PD-vLID group had significant inward deformation in the right thalamus compared to the PD-rLID group. Inward deformation in the thalamus was associated with an earlier onset of LID at baseline. This study suggests that independent of presynaptic dopamine depletion, the thalamus is a major neural substrate for LID and that a contracted thalamic shape at baseline is closely associated with an early development of LID.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据