4.7 Article

Genetic diversity of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) revealed using RAD-Seq SNP markers

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14358-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. KAKENHI from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [18K05624]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the genetic diversity of loquat and found that many of the internationally collected loquat genetic resources have unknown origins and differ from the genetic background of Japanese and Chinese cultivars. It also discovered that there are loquat varieties with different genetic backgrounds that may have been introduced to Mediterranean countries and North America.
Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) have originated in southeastern China and spread as a cultivated plant worldwide. Many of the loquat genetic resources collected internationally are of unknown origin, and their genetic background requires clarification. This study analyzed the genetic diversity of 95 accessions by using Rad-Seq SNP markers. Data analysis broadly classified loquat into three groups: (1) Japanese and Chinese cultivars and some Japanese strains (wild plants that are not used for commercial cultivation), (2) Vietnamese, Israeli, Greek, USA, and Mexican cultivars and strains, and (3) other Japanese strains. Group 2 is cultivated mostly outside of East Asia and was clearly distinct from the other groups, indicating that varieties of unknown origin with genetic backgrounds different from those of Japanese and Chinese cultivars may have been introduced to Mediterranean countries and North America. Because Japanese and Chinese cultivars belong to group 1, the current Japanese cultivars are derived from genetic resources brought from China. Some of group 1 may have been introduced to Japan before excellent varieties were developed in China, while group 3 may have been indigenous to Japan that have not been introduced by human activities, or may have been brought to Japan by human activities from China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据