4.7 Article

Predicting persistent central serous chorioretinopathy using multiple optical coherence tomographic images by deep learning

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13473-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute of Clinical Medicine Research of Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital
  2. College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully predicted the prognosis of central serous chorioretinopathy using multiple optical coherence tomography images and deep convolutional neural networks. The accuracy of prediction was improved by concatenating multiple image sets. These results are valuable for choosing the optimal treatment for patients with CSC.
We sought to predict whether central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) will persist after 6 months using multiple optical coherence tomography (OCT) images by deep convolutional neural network (CNN). This was a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. Multiple OCT images, including B-scan and en face images of retinal thickness (RT), mid-retina, ellipsoid zone (EZ) layer, and choroidal layer, were collected from 832 eyes of 832 CSC patients (593 self-resolving and 239 persistent). Each image set and concatenated set were divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and test (15%) sets. Training and validation were performed using ResNet50 CNN architecture for predicting CSC requiring treatment. Model performance was analyzed using the test set. The accuracy of prediction was 0.8072, 0.9200, 0.6480, and 0.9200 for B-scan, RT, mid-retina, EZ, and choroid modalities, respectively. When image sets with high accuracy were concatenated, the accuracy was 0.9520, 0.8800, and 0.9280 for B-scan + RT, B-scan + EZ, and EZ + RT, respectively. OCT B-scan, RT, and EZ en face images demonstrated good performances for predicting the prognosis of CSC using CNN. The performance improved when these sets were concatenated. The results of this study can serve as a reference for choosing an optimal treatment for CSC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据