4.7 Article

Metabolic modeling-based drug repurposing in Glioblastoma

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14721-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L013940/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [BB/L013940/1]
  3. Stoneygate Trust [CARO/SS/2016/CC1]
  4. University of Nottingham

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heterogeneity of cancer hampers the development of universal cancer treatments, requiring tailored therapies for each type of cancer. Reprogramming cellular metabolism is seen as a potential source of drug targets. More strategies are needed to reduce and prioritize the list of potential candidates for drug repurposing.
The manifestation of intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity hinders the development of ubiquitous cancer treatments, thus requiring a tailored therapy for each cancer type. Specifically, the reprogramming of cellular metabolism has been identified as a source of potential drug targets. Drug discovery is a long and resource-demanding process aiming at identifying and testing compounds early in the drug development pipeline. While drug repurposing efforts (i.e., inspecting readily available approved drugs) can be supported by a mechanistic rationale, strategies to further reduce and prioritize the list of potential candidates are still needed to facilitate feasible studies. Although a variety of 'omics' data are widely gathered, a standard integration method with modeling approaches is lacking. For instance, flux balance analysis is a metabolic modeling technique that mainly relies on the stoichiometry of the metabolic network. However, exploring the network's topology typically neglects biologically relevant information. Here we introduce Transcriptomics-Informed Stoichiometric Modelling And Network analysis (TISMAN) in a recombinant innovation manner, allowing identification and validation of genes as targets for drug repurposing using glioblastoma as an exemplar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据