Modeling the impact of indoor relative humidity on the infection risk of five respiratory airborne viruses

With a modified version of the Wells-Riley model, we simulated the size distribution and dynamics of five airborne viruses (measles, influenza, SARS-CoV-2, human rhinovirus, and adenovirus) emitted from a speaking person in a typical residential setting over a relative humidity (RH) range of 20-80% and air temperature of 20-25 degrees C. Besides the size transformation of virus-containing droplets due to evaporation, respiratory absorption, and then removal by gravitational settling, the modified model also considered the removal mechanism by ventilation. The trend and magnitude of RH impact depended on the respiratory virus. For rhinovirus and adenovirus humidifying the indoor air from 20/30 to 50% will be increasing the relative infection risk, however, this relative infection risk increase will be negligible for rhinovirus and weak for adenovirus. Humidification will have a potential benefit in decreasing the infection risk only for influenza when there is a large infection risk decrease for humidifying from 20 to 50%. Regardless of the dry solution composition, humidification will overall increase the infection risk via long-range airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Compared to humidification at a constant ventilation rate, increasing the ventilation rate to moderate levels 0.5 -> 2.0 h(-1) will have a more beneficial infection risk decrease for all viruses except for influenza. Increasing the ventilation rate from low values of 0.5 h(-1) to higher levels of 6 h(-1) will have a dominating effect on reducing the infection risk regardless of virus type.

Automated summary

Using a modified Wells-Riley model, this study investigated the infection risk of different respiratory viruses under various relative humidity and ventilation conditions. The results showed that increasing indoor humidity could potentially increase the infection risk for rhinovirus and adenovirus, while it may benefit influenza virus. Increasing ventilation rate could decrease the infection risk, especially when the rate is increased from low to high levels.