4.7 Article

N(6)-methyladenosine methylation-regulated polo-like kinase 1 cell cycle homeostasis as a potential target of radiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15196-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Medical Research and Education, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology [21K19526, 20H00541, 18KK0251, 18K15631]
  3. Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund
  4. Mitsubishi Foundation
  5. Takeda Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In pancreatic cancer, METTL3 regulates the methylation of PLK1 gene, which affects tumor development and patient prognosis. IGF2BP2 binds to the methylated site of PLK1 RNA and regulates its expression. Demethylation of this site activates mitotic catastrophe and increases radiosensitivity in pancreatic cancer cells.
In pancreatic cancer, methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), a N(6)-methyladenosine (m6A) methyltransferase, has a favorable effect on tumors and is a risk factor for patients' prognosis. However, the details of what genes are regulated by METTL3 remain unknown. Several RNAs are methylated, and what genes are favored in pancreatic cancer remains unclear. By epitranscriptomic analysis, we report that polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is an important hub gene defining patient prognosis in pancreatic cancer and that RNA methylation is involved in regulating its cell cycle-specific expression. We found that insulin like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2 (IGF2BP2) binds to m6A of PLK1 3 & PRIME; untranslated region and is involved in upregulating PLK1 expression and that demethylation of this site activates the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein pathway by replicating stress and increasing mitotic catastrophe, resulting in increased radiosensitivity. This suggests that PLK1 methylation is essential for cell cycle maintenance in pancreatic cancer and is a new therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据