4.7 Article

Effect of plasma sericin glutaraldehyde treatments on the low stress mechanical properties of micro denier polyester/cotton blended fabric

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13661-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the impact of different treatments on the low-stress mechanical properties of MDP/C-65/35 fabrics. The use of sericin and glutaraldehyde as a cross-linking agent resulted in higher bending rigidity. However, it was found that the tensile resilience of blend fabrics deteriorated following sericin treatment. Additionally, sericin treatment led to increased shear rigidity and hysteresis. The compression properties of the fabric also suffered deterioration, particularly in harder samples. Surface properties such as friction coefficient and surface contour deviation were generally higher in some cases compared to the control and sericin-treated fabrics.
This study aimed to see how different treatments affect the low-stress mechanical properties of micro-denier polyester/cotton (MDP/C-65/35) fabrics. This blend was chosen for the study because it is the most popular blend used in polyester/cotton blended material. The results of fabric properties treated with sericin revealed that fabrics treated with sericin and glutaraldehyde as a cross-linking agent had higher bending rigidity, regardless of how it was tested. Concerning the blend fabrics, it was noticed that there was deterioration in tensile resilience following sericin treatment. Shear rigidity, accompanied by shear hysteresis, showed an increase in sericin-treated fabrics. Compression properties were affected by the treatment, and in general, the fabric suffered deterioration in those the samples were hard. Surface properties such as coefficient of friction, mean deviation of friction and mean deviation of surface contour were found to be higher than those of the control and sericin-treated fabrics in a few cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据