4.2 Article

A new species of Fogedia (Bacillariophyceae) from tidal flats of Northeast Asia

期刊

PHYTOTAXA
卷 554, 期 1, 页码 77-84

出版社

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.554.1.6

关键词

new species; Fogedia orientalis; Northeast Asia; tidal flats; biogeography

资金

  1. project entitled Development of living shoreline technology based on blue carbon science toward climate change adaptation - Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF), Republic of Korea [20220526]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2020R1I1A2066477]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genus Fogedia was established in 1997 and subsequently expanded to include a total of 13 species, with the description of a new species called Fogedia orientalis sp. nov. The morphological similarities and differences of the new species, as well as the global distribution of all 13 Fogedia species, have been provided.
The genus Fogedia was first established in 1997 based on Navicula giffeniana as a type species. The important features of the genus were the presence of lateral area, the location of the internal raphe fissure, and the simple apical raphe endings. Later, the generic description of Fogedia has been emended with the reports of four new species to the science having the genus to include twelve members in total. A thirteenth member of the genus has been observed in tidal flats of the Yellow Sea, and here we describe the species as Fogedia orientalis sp. nov. based on observations with the light (LM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Regional distribution of the species in the Northeast Asia is also discussed. The new Fogedia species is morphologically similar to F. densa in terms of small cell size as wells as the absence of a lateral area, however, the density and pattern of striae are clearly different from each other. Morphological characteristics and global occurrences of the thirteen Fogedia species has been provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据