4.7 Article

Predictive Equation to Estimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Older Chilean Women

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14153199

关键词

resting metabolic rate; older adult; waist circumference; indirect calorimetry; predictive equations

资金

  1. Universidad del Bio-Bio [DIUBB 2140279 GI/EF, 196021GI/VC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to analyze the influence of waist circumference (WC) in predicting resting metabolic rate (RMR) and propose a specific estimation equation for older Chilean women. The results showed that the proposed equation had the best adequacy and lowest overestimation.
Resting metabolic rate (RMR) depends on body fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM), whereas abdominal fat distribution is an aspect that has yet to be adequately studied. The objective of the present study was to analyze the influence of waist circumference (WC) in predicting RMR and propose a specific estimation equation for older Chilean women. This is an analytical cross-sectional study with a sample of 45 women between the ages of 60 and 85 years. Weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and WC were evaluated. RMR was measured by indirect calorimetry (IC) and %FM using the Siri equation. Adequacy (90% to 110%), overestimation (>110%), and underestimation (<90%) of the FAO/WHO/UNU, Harris-Benedict, Mifflin-St Jeor, and Carrasco equations, as well as those of the proposed equation, were evaluated in relation to RMR as measured by IC. Normal distribution was determined according to the Shapiro-Wilk test. The relationship of body composition and WC with RMR IC was analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. The RMR IC was 1083.6 +/- 171.9 kcal/day, which was significantly and positively correlated with FFM, body weight, WC, and FM and inversely correlated with age (p < 0.001). Among the investigated equations, our proposed equation showed the best adequacy and lowest overestimation. The predictive formulae that consider WC improve RMR prediction, thus preventing overestimation in older women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据