4.7 Article

Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance Is Inversely Related to Incident Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14153039

关键词

liver fibrosis; insulin resistance; incidence; Korean; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

资金

  1. Eulji University [2022EMBRISN0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that metabolic score for IR (METS-IR) was inversely associated with ALF in patients with NAFLD, and its predictive ability for ALF was higher than that of triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and homeostatic model assessment for IR (HOMA-IR).
We determined the relationships between metabolic score for IR (METS-IR), triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, and homeostatic model assessment for IR (HOMA-IR) and incident advanced liver fibrosis (ALF) and assessed the abilities of the three IR indicators to predict ALF in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in adults with NAFLD who were aged 40-69 years old. Among 2218 participants with NAFLD at baseline, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting ALF of the METS-IR was 0.744 (0.679-0.810), significantly higher than that of TyG index (0.644 (0.569-0.720)) or that of HOMA-IR (0.633 (0.556-0.710)). Among 1368 patients with NAFLD and without ALF at baseline, 260 (19.0%) patients with NAFLD progressed to ALF during the 16-year follow-up period. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that the adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for incident ALF in the highest tertiles of METS-IR, TyG index, and HOMA-IR compared with the lowest tertile of each IR indicator were 0.5 (0.36-0.91), 0.7 (0.49-1.00), and 1.01 (0.71-1.42), respectively. METS-IR was inversely associated with ALF in patients with NAFLD, which cautiously suggests that the risk of ALF may need to be evaluated when metabolic parameters improve in individuals with NAFLD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据