4.7 Article

The Relationship of Physical Activity and Dietary Quality and Diabetes Prevalence in US Adults: Findings from NHANES 2011-2018

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14163324

关键词

diabetes mellitus; physical activity; diet; young adults; middle-aged adults; older adults

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL151452]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the relationship between physical activity and dietary quality with diabetes prevalence. The results suggest that meeting physical activity recommendations and having a higher dietary quality can lower the odds of diabetes, especially in middle-aged men and women.
This study aimed to examine the relationship of physical activity and/or dietary quality and diabetes prevalence in the general population and within specific age groups. It was a cross-sectional study using 2011-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the US Department of Agriculture's Food Patterns Equivalents data (n = 15,674). Physical activity was measured by Global Physical Activity questionnaire; dietary quality was analyzed using the Healthy Eating Index 2015; diabetes prevalence was determined by reported diagnosis and glycohemoglobin or fasting glucose. Data were analyzed using multiple logistic regression adjusted for demographic variables and weight status. Results revealed that although no statistically significant or non-substantial relationships were observed between dietary quality or physical activity and diabetes prevalence, respondents who did not meet physical activity recommendations regardless of dietary quality had a higher odds of diabetes prevalence than those who met physical activity recommendations and had a higher dietary quality (p < 0.05). In conclusion, meeting physical activity recommendations is an important protective factor for diabetes especially in combination with a higher quality diet. A healthy lifestyle appears to have the greater impact on diabetes prevention in middle-aged men and women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据