4.7 Article

Second-Trimester Constituents of the Metabolic Syndrome and Pregnancy Outcome: An Observational Cohort Study

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14142933

关键词

gestational diabetes; dyslipidemia; hypertension; obesity; preeclampsia; preterm birth; metabolic syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), metabolic syndrome (MetS) constituents, and pregnancy outcomes. The study found that factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and proteinuria were associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia and preterm birth, while obesity was not related to adverse outcomes.
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women in later life. In the general population, metabolic syndrome (MetS) shows identical associations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between GDM, constituents of MetS and pregnancy outcomes. Methods: Of 2041 pregnant women undergoing an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 22 and 30 weeks of gestation, data were collected to evaluate the constituents of MetS. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to determine the associations between MetS and pregnancy outcomes. Results: GDM and obesity did not affect the risk of fetal growth abnormalities (SGA/LGA), preterm birth or preeclampsia (PE). Hypertension significantly increased the risk of SGA (OR-1.59), PE (OR-3.14), and preterm birth <37 weeks (OR-2.17) and <34 weeks (OR-2.96) and reduced the occurrence of LGA (OR-0.46). Dyslipidemia increased the risk of PE (OR-2.25), while proteinuria increased the risk of PE (OR-12.64) and preterm birth (OR-4.72). Having >= 2 constituents increased the risk of PE and preterm birth. Conclusions: Constituents of metabolic syndrome, rather than treating impaired glucose handling, increased the risk of preeclampsia, altered fetal growth and preterm birth. Obesity was not related to adverse outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据