4.7 Article

Correlation between Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Level and Peripheral Arterial Stiffness in Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3-5 Patients

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14122429

关键词

brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; 25-hydroxyvitamin D; chronic kidney disease; peripheral artery stiffness

资金

  1. Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taiwan [TCMF-CP 110-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and older age were associated with peripheral arterial stiffness in patients with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease.
Vitamin D deficiency and high brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) are each independently associated with higher incidence of mortality and cardiovascular (CV) disease or CV events, respectively. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and baPWV in non-dialysis patients with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD). We enrolled 180 CKD patients. A commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. BaPWV values were measured using an automatic pulse wave analyzer. Either left or right baPWV > 18.0 m/s was considered indicative of peripheral arterial stiffness (PAS). In this study, 73 (40.6%) patients were found to have PAS. Compared to those without PAS (control group), patients with PAS were older and had higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure, higher levels of intact parathyroid hormone, and C-reactive protein, and lower levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (odds ratio [OR]: 0.895, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.828-0.968, p = 0.005) and old age (OR: 1.140, 95% CI 1.088-1.194, p < 0.001) to be independently associated with PAS in patients with stage 3-5 CKD. Lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and older age were associated with PAS in these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据