4.7 Article

Sign-tunable anisotropic magnetoresistance and electrically detectable dual magnetic phases in a helical antiferromagnet

期刊

NPG ASIA MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41427-022-00415-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2016R1D1A1B01013756, NRF-2017R1A5A1014862, NRF-2021R1A2C1006375, NRF-2022R1A2C1006740]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1D1A1B01013756] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we propose EuCo2As2 as a novel single-phase helimagnetic material that exhibits a remarkable sign reversal of anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR). By driving spin reorientation and spin structure evolution with a magnetic field, the potential of noncollinear antiferromagnets for spintronic device development is revealed.
Emerging from competing exchange interactions, the helimagnetic order describes a noncollinear spin texture of antiferromagnets. Although collinear antiferromagnets act as the elemental building blocks of antiferromagnetic (AFM) spintronics, until now, the potential of implementing spintronic functionality in noncollinear antiferromagnets has not been clarified. Here, we propose an AFM helimagnet of EuCo2As2 as a novel single-phase spintronic material that exhibits a remarkable sign reversal of anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR). The contrast in the AMR arises from two electrically distinctive magnetic phases with spin reorientation that is driven by the magnetic field prevailing in the easy plane, which converts the AMR from positive to negative. Furthermore, based on an easy-plane anisotropic spin model, we theoretically identified various AFM memory states associated with the evolution of the spin structure under magnetic fields. The results revealed the potential of noncollinear antiferromagnets for application in the development of spintronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据