4.6 Article

Gallic Acid-Functionalized, TiO2-Based Nanomaterial-Preparation, Physicochemical and Biological Properties

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15124177

关键词

DPPH assay; fibroblasts; MTT assay; photocytotoxicity; photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy

资金

  1. Poznan University of Medical Sciences [SDUMGB36/03/21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a method for wound healing and tissue regeneration using titanium(IV) oxide-based nanomaterials. The material was characterized and tested using various methods, and the results showed that the TiO2-GA material has antioxidant properties and can prevent bacterial infections.
Wound healing and skin tissue regeneration remain the most critical challenges faced by medical professionals. Titanium(IV) oxide-based materials were proposed as components of pharmaceutical formulations for the treatment of difficult-to-heal wounds and unsightly scarring. A gallic acid-functionalized TiO2 nanomaterial (TiO2-GA) was obtained using the self-assembly technique and characterized using the following methods: scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), infrared spectroscopy (IR), Raman spectroscopy and thermogravimetry (TG). Additionally, physicochemical and biological tests (DPPH assay, Microtox (R) acute toxicity test, MTT assay) were performed to assess antioxidant properties as well as to determine the cytotoxicity of the novel material against eukaryotic (MRC-5 pd19 fibroblasts) and prokaryotic (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, Aliivibrio fischeri) cells. To determine the photocytotoxicity of the material, specific tests were carried out with and without exposure to visible light lamps (425 nm). Following the results, the TiO2-GA material could be considered an additive to dressings and rinsing suspensions for the treatment of difficult-to-heal wounds that are at risk of bacterial infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据