4.6 Article

Adsorption Study of Congo Red Dye from Synthetic Wastewater at Different Concentrations Using Zinc Sulfide Nanoparticles

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15145048

关键词

ZnS; nanoparticles; structural parameters; adsorption; Congo red

资金

  1. Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania [17094, CNFIS-FDI-2022-0205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc sulfide (ZnS) nanoparticles were synthesized using the chemical precipitation method. The structural parameters of the ZnS were investigated using X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The synthesized ZnS nanoparticles showed promising adsorption efficiency for Congo red (CR) dye, and the intraparticle diffusion kinetic model was found to be the best fit among the tested models.
Zinc sulfide (ZnS) nanoparticles were fabricated using the chemical precipitation method. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques were used to investigate the structural parameters of the formed ZnS. The hexagonal crystal structure of the Zn and ZnS phases was formed. The average crystallite size of the ZnS phase is 10.3 nm, which is much smaller than that of the Zn phase (54.5 nm). Several frequencies and phonon modes were detected in the Raman scattering spectrum belonging to the ZnS nanoparticles. The synthesized ZnS nanoparticles were used as catalysts to eliminate the Congo red (CR) dye, with different concentrations, from synthetic wastewater. The impact of the CR dye concentration and shaking period on the adsorption of CR was thoroughly investigated, and various adsorption kinetic models were tested. After 3 h of shaking, the adsorption efficiency reached 26.01% for 40 mg/L CR dye and 27.84% for 20 mg/L CR dye. The adsorption capacities of the CR dye in the presence of ZnS are 16% and 9% for 40 and 20 mg/L, respectively. Based on the correlation factor, the intraparticle diffusion kinetic model was considered the best of the tested models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据