4.6 Article

Theoretical Study on the Structural, Elastic, Electronic and Thermodynamic Properties of Long-Period Superstructures h- and r-Al2Ti under High Pressure

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15124236

关键词

first-principles calculations; high pressure; structural properties; elastic properties; electronic structures; thermodynamic properties; long-period superstructures

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12064019, 51661013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the structural, elastic, electronic and thermodynamic properties of Al2Ti long-period superstructures under high pressure were systematically investigated. The results show that pressure has a significant impact on these properties, and the calculated values are consistent with available experimental and theoretical data.
The formations of long-period superstructures strongly influence the properties of Al-rich L1(0)-TiAl intermetallic alloys. To soundly understand the role of the superstructures in the alloys, fundamentals about them have to be known. In the present work, the structural, elastic, electronic and thermodynamic properties of h- and r-Al2Ti long-period superstructures under pressure up to 30 GPa were systematically investigated using first-principles calculations based on density functional theory. The pressure dependence of structural parameters, single-crystal elastic constants, polycrystalline elastic modulus, Cauchy pressures and elastic anisotropy were successfully calculated and discussed. The total and partial densities of states at different pressures were also successfully calculated and discussed. Furthermore, combining with quasi-harmonic approximation, the effects of the pressure on the temperature dependent volume, isothermal bulk modulus, thermal expansion coefficient, heat capacity and Gibbs free energy difference were successfully obtained and discussed. Our results were consistent with the available experimental and theoretical values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据