4.7 Article

Poly (crystal violet) - Multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified electrode for electroanalytical determination of luteolin

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 780, 期 -, 页码 46-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.08.037

关键词

Luteolin; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Poly (crystal violet); Differential pulse voltammetry

资金

  1. National Nature Foundation of China [21375001]
  2. Doctoral Program Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20103401110001]
  3. Foundation of Scientific Innovation Team of Anhui Province [2006KJ007TD]
  4. key discipline of Anhui Science and Technology University [AKZDXK2015A01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the aim of sensitive determination of luteolin, a new poly (crystal violet)/multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified electrode (PCV/MWCNTs/GCE) was fabricated by casting multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) onto the surface of glassy carbon electrode (GCE), then electro-polymerizing crystal violet (CV) on the MWCNTs/GCE matrix. Characterization of the novel modified electrode was carried out by cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The electrochemical behaviors of luteolin indicated that the PCV/MWCNTs/GCE can greatly enhance the electrocatalytic activity in the redox process of luteolin. It leads to a considerable improvement of the redox peak current for luteolin and allows the development of a sensitive voltammetric sensor for the determination of luteolin. Under optimized conditions, the oxidative peak currents increased linearly for the concentration of luteolin in the range of 2.0 x 10(-9) to 7.0 x 10(-5) M with a detection limit of 5.0 x 10(-9) M (S/N = 3). The novel modified electrode demonstrated high sensitivity, good reproducibility and long-term stability. The proposed method was adopted for detection of luteolin in Chrysanthemum as a real sample with satisfactory results. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据