4.6 Article

Pharmacological affinity fingerprints derived from bioactivity data for the identification of designer drugs

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-022-00607-6

关键词

New psychoactive substances; Pharmacological affinity fingerprint; Bioactivity data; Similarity search; Unsupervised clustering; Machine learning

资金

  1. MERCURY consortium
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1229354, CHE-1662030, CHE-2018427]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the pharmacological affinity fingerprints of NPS compounds were predicted using Random Forest classification models. The results suggest that using Morgan fingerprints as input for the construction of Ph-fp can achieve satisfactory clustering performance.
Facing the continuous emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) and their threat to public health, more effective methods for NPS prediction and identification are critical. In this study, the pharmacological affinity fingerprints (Ph-fp) of NPS compounds were predicted by Random Forest classification models using bioactivity data from the ChEMBL database. The binary Ph-fp is the vector consisting of a compound's activity against a list of molecular targets reported to be responsible for the pharmacological effects of NPS. Their performance in similarity searching and unsupervised clustering was assessed and compared to 2D structure fingerprints Morgan and MACCS (1024-bits ECFP4 and 166-bits SMARTS-based MACCS implementation of RDKit). The performance in retrieving compounds according to their pharmacological categorizations is influenced by the predicted active assay counts in Ph-fp and the choice of similarity metric. Overall, the comparative unsupervised clustering analysis suggests the use of a classification model with Morgan fingerprints as input for the construction of Ph-fp. This combination gives satisfactory clustering performance based on external and internal clustering validation indices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据