4.6 Article

BitterMatch: recommendation systems for matching molecules with bitter taste receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-022-00612-9

关键词

Bitter; GPCRs; Taste; Machine learning; Drugs

资金

  1. ISF [1129/19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed the BitterMatch algorithm to predict associations between bitter substances and receptors, achieving encouraging results in experiments. The algorithm combines receptor properties and experimental data, making it useful for predicting off-target effects, identifying new ligands, and guiding flavor design.
Bitterness is an aversive cue elicited by thousands of chemically diverse compounds. Bitter taste may prevent consumption of foods and jeopardize drug compliance. The G protein-coupled receptors for bitter taste, TAS2Rs, have species-dependent number of subtypes and varying expression levels in extraoral tissues. Molecular recognition by TAS2R subtypes is physiologically important, and presents a challenging case study for ligand-receptor matchmaking. Inspired by hybrid recommendation systems, we developed a new set of similarity features, and created the BitterMatch algorithm that predicts associations of ligands to receptors with similar to 80% precision at similar to 50% recall. Associations for several compounds were tested in-vitro, resulting in 80% precision and 42% recall. The encouraging performance was achieved by including receptor properties and integrating experimentally determined ligand-receptor associations with chemical ligand-to-ligand similarities. BitterMatch can predict off-targets for bitter drugs, identify novel ligands and guide flavor design. The novel features capture information regarding the molecules and their receptors, which could inform various chemoinformatic tasks. Inclusion of neighbor-informed similarities improves as experimental data mounts, and provides a generalizable framework for molecule-biotarget matching.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据